A decadelong debate over a notorious gate in the Crestview neighborhood is likely to reach its conclusion today, with City Council set to vote on a zoning change that would get rid of the gate at Easy Wind Drive and Morrow Street once and for all. 

In 2011, the Crestview Neighborhood Association pushed to add the gate in order to restrict vehicle access to Morrow Street from Crestview Station, a new transit-oriented development. Council enshrined the gate into the neighborhood’s TOD zoning ordinance that year.

Fast-forward a decade, and Council reversed course. In September 2021, after vandalism and neighborhood complaints, Council decided to study what would happen if the gate was removed. Vandalism had made the gate’s upkeep expensive; in 2021 alone, it cost $15,000 to maintain , according to the Public Works Department. 

Following a three-month study that showed traffic safety metrics with and without the gate, the Transportation Department said in January that the gate posed no significant safety risks and that traffic, despite an initial spike, calmed to manageable levels. Traffic engineers also found that vehicle speeds remained within a safe range for a neighborhood street.

“ATD generally does not support restricting or closing public streets when such measures do not improve safety or mobility for the greater public,” Rob Spillar, former ATD director, wrote in a January memo . 

ATD’s findings prompted Council to vote unanimously in February to remove the clause in the zoning ordinance.

On May 24, the Planning Commission was charged with evaluating the zoning change, and the discussion highlighted the gate’s ongoing controversy. Several neighbors spoke in opposition to removing the gate, and commissioners were of split opinion.

The neighbors who spoke at the commission meeting argued that allowing vehicle traffic through the neighborhood makes streets less safe, goes against TOD zoning’s goal of encouraging non-car transportation and encourages “cut-through” traffic on Morrow.

“Why are we considering allowing for more vehicular traffic? How exactly will that encourage public transit and pedestrian use?” Helen Kelley-Bass said. Another neighbor, Andrew Crawford, criticized ATD’s study as car-centric. “We didn’t study the impact to pedestrians and bicyclists. We did study cars,” Crawford said.

Following resident testimony, Commissioner Grayson Cox argued that disregarding the zoning ordinance – and neighbors’ hard work negotiating over it – would cause residents to distrust the city and encourage them to oppose any future zoning changes. “Guess what – if we blow this up, what is the point of them even engaging in the process?” Cox said.

“I also hear Commissioner Cox’s frustration on overturning a decision that had been made before,” Commissioner Awais Azhar said, “but I also want to say if we cannot reconsider decisions made 10 years ago, then I think we have stagnant policy and we will not be able to address the current issues.”

Commissioner Jeff Thompson argued that streets should not be de facto privatized. “When I hear words like cut-through traffic, I hear in my mind, ‘I want to privatize this street. I want to gate my neighborhood and keep the public out of my street.’ But it’s not your street, it’s a public street,” Thompson said. 

A motion by Azhar to recommend the zoning change failed 4-5, with commissioners Todd Shaw, Carmen Llanes Pulido, Rob Schneider and Solveij Rosa Praxis joining Cox in dissent. A motion by Cox to recommend denying the zoning change also failed, 3-4-2, with Cox, Llanes Pulido, and Praxis in favor and Shaw and Schneider abstaining.  

Based on Council’s unanimous vote in February to initiate the zoning change, the fate of the gate looks all but sealed.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?

Austin City Council: The Austin City Council is the body with legislative purview over the City of Austin. It offers policy direction, while the office of the City Manager implements administrative actions based on those policies. Until 2012, the body contained seven members, including the city's Mayor, all elected at-large. In 2012, City of Austin residents voted to change that system and now 10 members of the Council are elected based on geographic districts. The Mayor continues to be elected at-large.

Crestview: Crestview is a north central Austin neighborhood bounded by Wooten and West Anderson Lane to the north, Allandale and Burnet Road to the west, Brentwood and Justin Lane to the south and the Highland neighborhood and North Lamar Boulevard to the east.

Transportation Department: This city department is responsible for municipal transportation planning including roadways and bikeways.

Emails I Want to Receive

See which district you live in.

The Austin Monitor is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit and nonparsitan news organization. We are fully-local and cover the important issues and key decisions at the intersection between the local government and the community.

© Copyright 2022 Austin Monitor. All rights reserved.